Dir: ANTONIO MARGHERITICountry: ITALY/SPAIN
AKA:
Cannibals in the Streets
Cannibals in the Streets
Cannibals in the City
Cannibal Massacre
Invasion of the Flesh Hunters
Italian journeyman filmmaker Antonio Margheriti certainly knows how to churn out a decent genre B movie. Like the majority of directors working in popular Italian cinema during the 1960’s, 70’s and 80’s Margheriti (who often used the nom de plume Anthony M. Dawson) had a high degree of skill in switching genres. He’s pretty much done it all - from Mario Bava inspired gothic horror like Horror Castle (1963) and Castle of Blood (1964) to gialli like Naked You Die (1968) and Seven Deaths in the Cats Eye (1973). Outside the horror genre Margheriti has directed science-fiction, spy adventures, sword and sandal peplum adventures, and war films. It is no surprise then that Cannibal Apocalypse which blends several sub-genres is a very enjoyable, confident, efficient, if somewhat mindless B movie that gives the director the opportunity to hone his skills at shooting action sequences.
The flashback sequence which opens the film immediately highlights that this particular cannibal film is going to be radically different to the jungle adventures of Cannibal Holocaust (1980) and Cannibal Ferox (1981). This sequence is set in Vietnam as Captain Norman Hopper (John Saxon) and his platoon scour the jungle for their imprisoned comrades. The two POW’s Charlie Bukowski (Giovanni Lombarde Radice) and Tom Thompson (Tony King) are so thankful to be released that one of them takes a big bite out of Hoppers arm. Unfortunately their time as Vietnamese POW’s has resulted in them becoming cannibals. The film never adequately explains how this happens, but it doesn’t really matter because we get to see plenty of shooting and the liberal use of a flamethrower. This sequence is marred somewhat by the cheapskate tactic of including library footage from the Vietnam War which is clumsily edited into the film. Visually at least the film gets on a more even keel when the actions shifts to Atlanta, Georgia. Hoppers nightmares are not the only manifestation of a mind troubled about events in Vietnam. The raw meat in his fridge becomes awfully tempting to him, and when seduced by the prick tease girl next door he has a little nibble on her. Meanwhile Bukowski is walking the streets (the film implies a failure in the psychiatric profession, but doesn’t have time to develop this critique) and pretty soon he’s dining on exposed human flesh. It doesn’t take long for the old Vietnam gang to get back together and pretty soon the cannibal contagion is spreading. Its up to seasoned veteran cop Captain McCoy (Wallace Wilkinson) to make the sure the spread is contained.
© Shaun Anderson 2010
Got it on my q, gonna watch it as soon as possible!
ReplyDeleteI've not seen this one, Shaun, though John Saxon is apparently quite embarrassed by it. Your review paints a vivid picture, and I should probably seek out a copy. Though you had me at 'liberal use of a flamethrower'. ;o)
ReplyDelete"The labyrinthine tunnels and passageways of the sewer system offers an effective metaphor for the strangulating atmosphere of the Vietnam jungle..."
ReplyDeleteShaun, I respect anyone willing to invest their time and energy to provide a nuanced appraisal of film content beyond the literal (particularly with exploitation cinema), but in the case of 'Cannibal Apocalypse' - HOW did you do it??!? I found sitting through this film a mind-numbingly boring experience, and only stuck with it for John Saxon.
Hi there Johnny - Well firstly I have to admit I didn't mind CANNIBAL APOCALYPSE at all. It's not a great film, but it is by no means a disaster. It is very dull in places as you note, but overall I thought it was quite a distinctive little film. For me film is unquestionably an art form (some may argue against this) and I include exploitation cinema in this. I think it's vital to write about and approach films like CA in the same manner you might CITIZEN KANE for example. I dont mean you have to be horrendously serious about the whole thing, but to approach all films on an equal playing field is what I aim to do. That's the aim, but you'll probably find numerous reviews on this site that contradict my previous statement!
ReplyDelete