Monday, 20 December 2010

Masters of Horror: Dreams in the Witch House (2005)

Dir: STUART GORDON
Country: USA

First transmitted on 04/11/2005
Masters of Horror - Series 1, Episode 2

Many filmmakers have attempted to navigate the delirious cosmic terrors of H. P. Lovecraft, but Stuart Gordon has been the most persistent. I don’t rate Gordon particularly highly as a filmmaker, but he has achieved something nobody else has; he’s actually made a decent film based on Lovecraft material. In this case the blackly humorous Re-Animator (1985), a film which retained the spirit of Lovecraft, but bravely adopted a sardonic tone, the result of which was one of the most original variations on the themes established in dozens of Frankenstein films. Since then Gordon has returned to Lovecraft on four separate occassions with varying degrees of success. He followed Re-Animator with From Beyond (1986) and offered up a visually ravishing spectacle full of colour and surreal special effects, but sadly the film had more artifice than substance, and only rarely approached the agitated feverishness of Lovecraft. His third attempt at Lovecraft was Castle Freak (1995), based on the story The Outsider and was largely an unsatisfactory and uninspired affair. This was followed by Dagon (2001), a film which has cultivated something of a cult reputation, but once again betrayed the narrative and the sense of encroaching and impending doom in favour of highly impressive visuals and a colour palette bathed in a chilly blue. His fifth attempt was on the invitation of Mick Garris for the first season of Masters of Horror. Gordon chose to adapt the tale Dreams in the Witch House, and the result is easily Gordon’s feeblest and most lacklustre Lovecraft adaptation to date.



Ezra Godden plays physics grad student Walter Gilman, a sappy pathetic little geek whose expensive studies at the Miskatonic University (this implies the setting is Arkham) has forced him to take a room in a dilapidated and rat infested old house. The white vested slob of a manager is far from helpful, but Gilman is just looking for a quiet space so he can continue with his dissertation. Before long strange things are afoot, a downstairs neighbour prays loudly in the night while thumping his head on a wooden chair and warns him about rats with human faces. Next door is a single parent struggling to make ends meet, who offers at least a real sense of hardship and poverty. Before long Gilman’s dreams have been invaded and he must contend with odd noises coming from inside the walls of his bedroom. The drunken crank below warns of a witch, and although Gilman initially scoffs at this he soon begins to believe there is more to the old man’s tales than drunken ravings. The first encounter with the witch is a highlight; Gilman is babysitting for Frances (Chelah Horsdal) who has a job interview, and the witch appears to him as her. Their lovemaking seals his doom, and leaves him with some rather nasty scratches on his back.



The rat with the human face turns out to be the witches’ familiar, and ends up doing a lot more damage than the witch herself. This creature is quite repulsive, and any horror the story has is generated by this foul and rather vocal pest. Because the narrative deals strongly with dreams and nightmares this immediately gives the writers (Stuart Gordon and Dennis Paoli) license to make nonsensical plot decisions. The action shifts with rapidity and without explanation; the oddest being when Gilman awakens to find himself at the University with the obligatory Necronomicon laid out before him. While this adds a touch of Lovecraftian continuity the sense of ancient power embodied by Lovecraft’s beings and monsters is entirely absent. The witch collects the souls of dead infants, and is shaping Gilman to perform the sacrifice, but the witch herself is easily overcome and is totally devoid of the ancient pervasive evil of other Lovecraft creations. Oddly for Stuart Gordon he just doesn’t give the episode enough of a Lovecraft feel, and it becomes little more than a haunted house story with a few fantastical flourishes. It isn’t helped by a bland hero, supported by a plethora of equally bland supporting characters. The visual dullness is offset by some gory special effects, but in the end this is incredibly tame and Lovecraft-light.



Dreams in the Witch House does pull off one surprise shock when Gilman is unable to save the baby, he is discovered cradling its corpse, and soon finds himself in a padded cell recounting his tale to uncomprehending medics. Although the detectives find much evidence to support his outlandish tale they prefer to forget about it in order to gain a conviction. If Dreams in the Witch House provides anything of value then it is the idea of economics forcing people to make bad decisions. Had Gilman not needed to save money, he would have been able to take a nice room in a nice part of town. Instead his decision to cut costs and corners leads him to becoming a baby killer and dying at the teeth of a very hungry rat with a human face. This was transmitted as the second episode of Masters of Horror and is not far shy of being a total failure. On this evidence we can only hope Stuart Gordon leaves Lovecraft well alone from now on.

© Shaun Anderson 2010

8 comments:

  1. I remember enjoying the old 1968 adaption of this that went under the title Curse Of The Crimson alter. Probably a lot more cheesier than this but still a heep of fun

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi there Cal - thanks for flagging that up, I should have mentioned it in my review. Yes I've seen CURSE OF THE CRIMSON ALTAR - wonderful cast including Boris Karloff, Christopher Lee, Barbara Steele, Michael Gough and Rupert Davies...as an adaptation of Lovecraft quite terrible, but a lot of fun and much more enjoyable than this version.

    ReplyDelete
  3. it was strange as most of tigons output was either great or terrible, this was just good.

    ReplyDelete
  4. As with Hammer and Amicus when Tigon were on form they produced some exceptional films (THE SORCERERS, WITCHFINDER GENERAL, BLOOD ON SATAN'S CLAW), but when they were bad (which was more often than not) the results were pitiful (THE BLOOD BEAST TERROR, THE BODY STEALERS, THE BEAST IN THE CELLAR)to name a few.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I personally enjoyed this film, but Im a huge Gordon nut. The story its based on is far more epic, we actually visit the witches dimension, and its far more surreal and otherwordly then what we see in the film. This, like many of Gordons H.P. Lovecraft adaptations takes certain elements from Lovecrafts stories and expands on them, they are never really a literal adaptation. It would be interesting to see Gordon doing a serious literal translatition of a Lovecraft tale. As opposed to taking Lovecrafts premises and playing with them. Still, I enjoyed this film, and thought it was a good horror story.

    I also dug Castle Freak as a story of redemption, loved seeing Barbara Crampton and Dr. Herbert West acting together again. I also thought it adapted Lovecrafts story rather well, actually, the film expanded on the short stories premise. Castle Freak offers up some interesting gory moments as well! The make up on the creature is excellent as well.

    My favorite of all his films are From Beyond and Dagon.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The only film based on a Lovecraft work that I rate highly is RE-ANIMATOR. In saying that though I think Gordon's best film is DOLLS. I think we are still waiting for a wholly satisfying screen version that approximates the feel and atmosphere of Lovecraft. This episode of MASTERS OF HORROR certainly doesn't achieve that.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Not even DAGON Shaun? I found that to be one of Gordon's strongest films, and I believe CASTLE FREAK might also be a loose Lovecraft adaptation as well? I don't like this updated version of the story at all, I gloss over it every time we watch the series.

    ReplyDelete
  8. No, I wasn't overly impressed with DAGON Carl. Yes CASTLE FREAK was based on one of his earliest short stories THE OUTSIDER, I mentioned that in the first paragraph. A dreadful episode in my view, but I wasn't really surprised about that.

    ReplyDelete