Thursday 13 January 2011

A Blade in the Dark (1983)

Dir: LAMBERTO BAVA
Country: ITALY

AKA:
La casa con la scala nel buio
House of the Dark Stairway

I first encountered Lamberto Bava’s second feature film A Blade in the Dark about a decade ago. My memories of this viewing experience were unanimously positive, so I felt a certain amount of upbeat optimism as I slotted the Blue Underground DVD into my player and screened it for the second time in preparation for this month long giallo season. To say I wasn’t expecting such a bad film might be the understatement of the year. A Blade in the Dark is living proof that returning to films every few years is a vital part of film scholarship. This is Lamberto Bava’s gushing and masturbatory tribute to the giallo productions of Dario Argento. You can almost see Bava kneeling at the altar of Argento and genuflecting before his messiah. Or perhaps better still flagellating his flabby form too appease his filmmaking master. The starkly lit visual presentation (even night time scenes are bright) is a complete lift from the previous years Tenebre, a film upon which Bava also worked. The protagonist who is stalked by an unseen assailant as the bodies stack up is clearly a nod to Marcus Daly from Deep Red (1975). The only difference is that one composes avant-garde jazz music (and represents high culture) and the other is employed to compose a score for a horror film (and represents low culture). Although both musicians approach the art from different perspectives and both characters are weedy A Blade in the Dark’s Bruno (Andrea Occhipinti) is so lifeless, lame, and pathetic one prays for his extermination. If you want to see the difference between father and son watch this film. Mario Bava was a brilliant visual stylist who was heavily imitated by others, Lamberto is devoid of ideas and imitates others.



The film isn’t helped by a disastrously written screenplay by Elisa Briganti and Dardano Sacchetti. To give Sacchetti some credit he is excellent at creating situations and scenarios, and he is clearly an ideas man. But he is less than gifted when it comes to writing dialogue. The dubbing of the English language soundtrack of course doesn’t help, but Sacchetti has consistently displayed incompetence in the field of dialogue. Therefore as soon as his name appears on the screen it immediately indicates that the set pieces and plot structure will be of primary importance. This is of course vital in a giallo, and within the terms of its conventions A Blade in the Dark is almost a textbook example. The only problem is by 1983 the cycle was crying out for innovation, the last thing that audiences needed was yet another sub standard dumb Argento rip off. As it turns out we had to wait until 1987 for subversion and innovation, and unsurprisingly it came from Dario Argento. Lamberto Bava has about a tenth of Argento’s filmmaking talent, and a film like this only highlights his shortcomings as a filmmaker. The film totally lacks suspense, has an element of mystery which is thin and undeveloped, and a story which is so slight as to barely exist. The red herrings are so obvious that as each new character is introduced the film becomes increasingly ludicrous.

"Filmmaker" Lamberto Bava aka Dario Argento's bitch


The setting is a modern villa on the outskirts of Tuscany, a perfect place for limp dick Bruno to compose his music. This theme is repeated ad nauseam throughout. At times it exists as diegetic music when we see Bruno composing, but at other times it plays non-diegetically. It is both the theme of A Blade in the Dark and the theme for the film that Bruno is working on. This self reflexive position is first indicated by a pre-title sequence involving a bunch of kids in a creepy house on a dare, a scene which we soon discover is in fact part of the horror film Bruno is working on. It supposedly holds the key to the identity of the killer stalking the villa, but all it does is offer a hint to the psycho-sexual gender confusion to come. The actual identity of the killer cannot be deduced from anything within the film Bruno is working on. Instead the film continually emphasises gender disorder. The director of the film is a woman Sandra (Anny Papa), and to compensate for her lack of penis she dresses like a man and drinks hard liquor. The film sets these themes up but doesn't really do anything with them, and the subsequent reveal of the identity of the killer and the past event that has formed their psychosis lacks both surprise and resonance. Conceptions of femininity and masculinity are central to the giallo, but here they are included just as a hollow convention. The film has nothing to say about gender at all.

The stunning Lara Lamberti who plays troubled stage actress Julia


There are one or two things that do work in this lifeless garbage though. The villa is a very effective space. It has a pool, a large garden, winding corridors, and many empty rooms. It makes for one or two effective moments of stalking tension. The sexually frustrated gardener and handyman Giovanni (Stanko Molnar) covers the walls of his home with porn and cuts out news stories about murders. But he lights up the film when he is in it, in much the same way Molnar did in Bava’s debut feature Macabre (1980). The set pieces are typically brutal and violent, especially the fate of Angela in the bathroom, this will make anyone wince. Bava would develop his self-reflexive film within a film themes to greater effect in his following film Demons (1985), here it is wasted on a mindlessly derivative screenplay which is surprisingly incompetent.

© Shaun Anderson 2011

12 comments:

  1. Wow, you really hated this one didnt ya! I hear ya man, I was never convinced by Lamberto's work, I've seen a few of his films and they dont even reach the level of classy awesomeness that his fathers films achieved. I wasnt a big fan of SHOCK, Mario Bava's last film, which he made in collaboration with Lamberto.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi there Franco! - No I didn't like this at all. My own memories of it from when I first watched it about ten years ago deceived me. Of course since then I have probably watched the better part of 100 giallo films, and compared to most of them it is awful. I'm not fan of Bava Snr at all, I didnt think much of DEMONS or MACABRE either, though I would class the latter as his best film.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Man! I hate it when you remember something being so good, and when you revisit it, discover that no, no it isn't! I've read quite a few positive things about this and would still be quite keen to check it out. I quite like the idea of it being a textbook giallo - with added reflexivity. I've also read mainly positive things about Bava Jnr's directorial debut, Macabre - though I've yet to see it, too. What can I say? I'm more of a Bava Snr man.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I just realised I wrote above that I wasn't a fan of Bava Snr, a massive typo. I love most of Mario Bava's films - thanks for the comment James. I have actually myself written positive things about A BLADE IN THE DARK in the past based on a false memory. MACABRE is hands down Bava Jnr's best film, but even that is average at best. It is made distinctive by the weird subject matter. If you want a textbook giallo James, just watch BLOOD AND BLACK LACE again, much more fun.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Glad to hear that was a typo! I did wonder to myself.
    So you reckon I should just watch Blood and Black Lace again then? Ok, you've twisted my arm. Consider it done.
    Hope you have a blood-drenched and yellow weekend, Shaun. :)

    ReplyDelete
  6. I figured it was a typo, I know you love Mario Bavas films, I've read your views on many of his films. I've yet to see a couple of his films: Im dying to see Planet of the Vampires, but that one seems to be unavailable through netflix (only on instant watch, and I cant watch them that way yet) and Bay of Blood is another one I need to catch up with.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Cheers James :-) - I might re-watch BLOOD AND BLACK LACE myself...have a good one!

    Arrow Video recently put out a superb BAY OF BLOOD package Franco - a 2 disc standard definition DVD release with the English language and original Italian cut of the film, and the same package on Blu Ray. I watched it myself last night and the transfer is the best I've seen of this film. Expect a review soon!

    ReplyDelete
  8. I always find it to be one of the more entertaining Gialli, and one of Bava's better films. Plenty of bloody violence to quench my thirst, but certainly not one of the key examples in the genre. and while it may not be one of the best examples, it is one of the Gialli that epitomizes most of the defining characteristics for me.

    ReplyDelete
  9. It could do with being re-issued with an original language track, that might help it considerably. Filmmakers were producing textbook giallo's that epitomised the form in 1971 Carl, so I dont see this as something in its favour to be honest.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I never bothered with this one for much the way you feel about Lamberto, Shaun. I never picked up MACABRE, either. He also did a terminally horrible movie after this one, but before DEMONS called DEVIL FISH aka DEVOURING WAVES about a giant shark/octopus creature starring Michael Sopkiw and Gianni Garko.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Hmm, interesting... I think the only Lamberto Bava films I've seen are the "Demons" ones, and whilst I think they're brilliant fun, I can easily see why he might not quite be the go-to guy for a movie that demands, say, characters or a storyline... would still like to see this one though, if only to confirm for myself his lousiness as a serious filmmaker...

    ReplyDelete
  12. @ Brian - I think you should give MACABRE a look. It is without a doubt his best film, but unfortunately that isn't saying a great deal. I haven't had the pleasure of DEVIL FISH and don't ever expect too :-)

    @ Ben - I have to confess I'm not a fan of either of the DEMONS films either. I can see how they're fun, but they have always struck me (make up effects aside) as being very amateurish.

    ReplyDelete