Dir: ANDREW SINCLAIR
Country: UK-CANADA
1973
was a very busy and productive year for English actor Oliver Reed. He began it in the Italian/French
co-production Dirty Weekend, a
crime/comedy directed by Dino Risi, which paired him up with Marcello
Mastroianni. He followed this with the
historical drama Frenzy, an Italian/UK
co-production exploring the class divides in pre-revolutionary Russia, in which
he played Palizyn opposite Claudia Cardinale’s Anya. He continued his
association with Italian cinema in his following film Revolver (US title Blood on
the Streets) an excellent crime thriller directed by Sergio Sollima, which
saw Reed and Fabio Testi make unlikely allies as they uncover a far reaching
political conspiracy. Reed’s biggest success of 1973 was his following film,
playing Athos in Richard Lester’s spirited and entertaining screen version of The Three Musketeers. Reed’s fifth and
final screen credit of 1973 was in the obscure British film Blueblood, based on Alexander Thynne’s
novel The Carry Cot. There are those
who classify Blueblood as a horror
film, but it is more of a class drama in the mould of the Pinter/Losey
production The Servant (1962). The
motivations of the respective butler’s in each film are pretty much the same,
but their methodology differs. In Blueblood
Tom, played with the hulking brutishness and barely suppressed rage that became
Reed’s stock in trade, utilises witchcraft to secure his aims.
It
is a testament to Blueblood’s myriad
of failings that the most successful aspect of this production is the location
work. The film was shot entirely on location at Longleat House, in the
Wiltshire countryside. A result of this decision is that it creates a sense of
grandeur and opulence, which is offset by the commercialisation of the stately
home and its grounds, the latter of which has been converted into a safari
park. The role of the aristocrat Gregory is played by Derek Jacobi, though the
exact nature of his title and lineage remains something of a mystery. But the
continuance of his lineage, and the need for a male heir, is a major obsession
of this pampered ponce. This means that children are entirely necessary to Gregory;
the only problem is he has no interest in raising them. The only things that
concern the effeminate dilettante are holding parties for his posh friends,
painting the walls of the house with the garish excretions of his imagination,
taking a variety of drugs, and fucking his live in lover Carlotta (Anna Gaël).
Gregory is a useless parent, and his wife Lily (Fiona Lewis) is little better.
She flits in from time to time in breaks from her singing career to lay down
the law, and bathe in the stink of her own hypocrisy. Andrew Sinclair’s verbose
screenplay is at pains to make the aristocrats repulsive (though I confess to
leniency toward Gregory because he has an excellent taste in clothes), but a
major fault of the screenplay is that the servants led by the devilish Tom are
equally repugnant and vile.
Oliver
Reed is both the worst and best thing about this film. His character is saddled
with a horrendous accent, which at times Reed struggles manfully with. His
bloated face is also covered with white makeup as to emphasis his satanic
eyebrows, moustache, and piercing eyes. He parades around in a succession of
tight fitting suits which only adds to the general air of discomfort. This is
one of Reed’s least charismatic turns, and that he needs help from a satanic
ritual to ensnare the hearts and minds of those who surround him comes as no
surprise. But Reed possesses an effortless magnetism which makes even the most
staid and uninspired of characters compelling, and with his ability to click
into an indignant rage, he brings a genuine sense of class hatred to Tom. This
is illustrated most adroitly in a sequence in which he tells Lily that he is in
control of Gregory and subsequently the house and grounds. The power struggle
between Tom and Gregory is a very one sided battle. Gregory is weak and
dependant, and can be easily manipulated. If this doesn’t work all Tom has to
do is drop him some LSD. But the character of Tom seldom goes beyond
caricature, and the other servants are equally vapid and unworthy of support.
The
worst of these is the German nanny Beate (Meg Wynn Owen) who initially offers
promise when she senses the evil that permeates Tom. She suffers hallucinations
and dreams in which she sees Tom performing a satanic ritual (these inserts are
shot with red filters – 0/10 for originality to director Andrew Davis). Beate
ultimately succumbs to Tom’s will, but it is the characters cold frigidity
which is off putting, and it comes as no surprise when the repressed shrew
experiences sexual hallucinations as well. Her defence is so flimsy, her
attempts to fight Tom so pathetic, that he’s even able to engineer accusations
of ‘baby bashing’ toward her, which ultimately seals her fate. I’m not entirely
sure what message director Andrew Davis is wishing to convey here. The servants
are thieves, thugs, worshippers of Satan, and ultimately murderers. But those
who belong to the upper echelons are idle wasters who refuse their
responsibilities, and in a sense have it coming. The film doesn’t appear to
side with either, and in its failure to have a single redeeming character; it becomes
an empty and somewhat hollow exercise as a class allegory. At times the film
does engineer a certain sinister frisson, and on the level of a psychological
drama, it occasionally works quite well. But any elements of the horror or
thriller genres are suffocated amid the stultifying direction and the heavy
handed obviousness of the set up.
©
Shaun Anderson 2014
Hello again,Shaun! Good to find new postings on the highway! While you don't appear to love this film,it sounds like an interesting view. Do you know if it's ever been available for purchase?
ReplyDeleteA quick bit of research tells me BLUE BLOOD is available on DVD in the UK,as well as YouTube for free. a safe way to check it out.
ReplyDeleteBest to you as always,Shaun.
Thanks for the comments Dale! Very good to hear from you. I think that Oliver Reed is such a powerhouse performer that any film featuring his talents is likely to be an interesting view, and BLUE BLOOD is no exception. Although I wasn't particularly enamoured of it overall, I'd certainly recommend giving it a look.
ReplyDeleteThanks for stopping by :-)