Country: UK
Anthony Armstrong’s short tale The Case of Mr. Pelham began its screen life as the tenth episode in the first season of Alfred Hitchcock Presents in 1955. It was one of a handful of episodes from the first series directed by Hitchcock himself and was suitably memorable as a result. The narrative was designed for the short format of an anthology series, and the foremost question to consider when discussing The Man Who Haunted Himself is whether such a narrative stretches to feature length. The film does suffer from a fair amount of padding, but generally speaking Basil Dearden and Michael Relph’s screenplay maintains a sense of mystery and intrigue throughout, even if the outcome is somewhat obvious early on. For some reason this film has largely been written out of the annals of British horror/fantasy history. In my view this is a travesty, because this is a tense and taut little thriller, that is never less than very entertaining throughout. It is a hidden treasure ripe for rediscovery.
The director Basil Dearden at first glance would seem a very inappropriate choice for a fantasy genre picture like this. He was best known for a series of highly conservative social problem films he made in partnership with producer Michael Relph under the auspices of Ealing Studios. However a number of themes and concerns in films such as The Blue Lamp (1950), The Violent Playground (1958 - featuring a young David McCallum and Peter Cushing) and Sapphire (1959) are reconstituted in The Man Who Haunted Himself to reflect the permissiveness of modern Britain at the turn of the 1960’s. When one has ignored the daft way that Pelham’s doppelganger enters our world, one can begin to enjoy discovering the values that each version represents, and predict a possible outcome. The first Pelham or the real Pelham is stuffy, conservative and impeccably middle class. He wears a bowler hat to work, carries an umbrella and is a creature of habit. Furthermore (and crucially) he is sexually repressed and oblivious to the frustrations of his gorgeous wife. They have twin sons, which sets up the first of numerous dualities in the film. One could argue that this Pelham is representative of a bygone age of stiff upper lips, and emotional secrecy. In short Mr. Pelham has to lighten up! His doppelganger by contrast is thoroughly modern - in other words fun. He is not only sexually promiscuous, but also a gambler, a smoker, a drinker, and a driver of fast and dangerous sports cars (the opening car crash scene alludes to this). His carefree and permissive abandon situates him as the antagonist in the conservative universe Dearden creates.
© Shaun Anderson 2010
Very interesting write-up -- I've seen the Hitchcock episode before, and had no clue it had also served as the basis for a full-length motion pic. There were actually several episodes of that show that I felt could have been made into complete moves, though "Pelham" was never one that struck me that way.
ReplyDeleteAnyway...sounds cool...I'll look for it!
-Billy
Thanks for the comment Billy! - Yeah its a bit of an underwhelming episode, but it does have a very strong premise which I guess was strong enough for Relph and Dearden. This is well worth a look, but the whole film hinges on Roger Moore, so I guess enjoyment will very much depend upon whether you like Roger or not.
ReplyDeleteBasil Dearden was a fine director. I'm glad you mentioned Sapphire - it's a very underrated little movie.
ReplyDeleteI agree about Dearden, I think his films were the best things to come out of Ealing Studios - along with DEAD OF NIGHT. I've never been a fan of the so called comedies. I think he directed VICTIM as well, which was a brilliant film.
ReplyDeleteI've just watched this movie and it really is rather good. And I agree with you that it's Moore's finest moment as an actor.
ReplyDelete